People have different views about how much choice students should have with regard to what they can study at university. While some argue that it would be better for students to be forced into certain key subject areas, I believe that everyone should be able to study the course of their choice.
There are various reasons why people believe that universities should only offer subjects that will be useful in the future. They may assert that university courses like medicine, engineering and information technology are more likely to be beneficial than certain art degrees. From a personal perspective, it can be argued that these courses provide more job opportunities, career progression, better salaries, and therefore an improved quality of life for students who take them. On the societal level, by forcing people to choose particular university subjects, governments can ensure that any knowledge and skill gaps in the economy are covered. Finally, a focus on technology in higher education could lead to new inventions, economic growth, and greater future prosperity.
In spite of these arguments, I believe that university students should be free to choose their preferred areas of study. In my opinion, society will benefit more if our students are passionate about what they are learning. Besides, nobody can really predict which areas of knowledge will be most useful to society in the future, and it may be that employers begin to value creative thinking skills above practical or technical skills. If this were the case, perhaps we would need more students of art, history and philosophy than of science or technology.
In conclusion, although it might seem sensible for universities to focus only on the most useful subjects, I personally prefer the current system in which people have right to study whatever they like.
人们对学生在大学学习时应该有多少选择有不同的看法。虽然有些人认为最好是强迫学生进入某些关键学科领域，但我认为每个人都应该能够研究他们选择的课程。
人们认为大学应该只提供将来有用的科目有很多原因。他们可能会断言，像医学、工程和信息技术这样的大学课程比某些艺术学位更可能是有益的。从个人的角度来看，可以说，这些课程提供更多的就业机会，职业发展，更好的工资，因此，提高学生的生活质量，他们采取。在社会层面上，通过强迫人们选择特定的大学科目，政府可以确保经济中的知识和技能差距得到弥补。最后，把重点放在高等教育技术上可以带来新发明、经济增长和更大的未来繁荣。
尽管有这些论点，我认为大学生应该有自由选择他们喜欢的学习领域。在我看来，如果我们的学生对他们所学的东西充满热情，社会将受益更多。此外，没有人能真正预测哪些领域的知识将来对社会最有用，雇主可能会开始重视创造性思维技能，而不是实用或技术技能。如果是这样的话，也许我们需要更多的艺术、历史和哲学的学生，而不是科学或技术。
总之，虽然大学似乎只关注最有用的学科，但我个人更倾向于当前的系统，在这个系统中，人们有权学习他们喜欢的任何东西。
